derekfnord wrote:A good example of this is in the Alan Shaw essay, where he talks about the significance of the bong that's supposedly on Aunt Ruth's shelves next to a magnifying glass. Frankly, I couldn't definitely identify it even after knowing I should look for it, where I should look for it, when I should look for it, and why I should look for it. And even then, I could tell there was some object there, but I wouldn't say it's clear it's a bong by any stretch of the imagination. So to me, there's no way that seeing the "bong" (if bong it be) can be crucial to understanding the movie, because there's no way Lynch could just assume everyone (or anyone) would catch that.
Yeah, that damn Alan Shaw nicking other people's discoveries without acknowledgement.
Bong or no bong, half the ideas he came up with were taken from RT without accreditation. Sorry. Just gets my goat a bit some of that stuff. I said a few weeks ago I would make a "Shaw Essay" discussion thread. I should do that soon - don't want to derail this thread.


to find your friend, Rita, here."


