It has been raised as a theory that the suicide at the end could be a device to 'wake the dreamer up, as one cannot die in their own dream'. This indicates multiple dream levels, and appeals to me due to the film language of that scene (it appeared stylised to suggest this, and the location on the bed at the gunshot neither matches the discovered dead body, nor the pillow scene at the beginning).
If this is a thread already progressing, could someone kindly direct me to it.
I find this theory appealing because if the suicide is actually forcing a waking from a dream, then where does the next scene occur? - I would suggest the next scene would be the CINEMA, and the AUDIENCE would then be complicit in the dreaming, and therefore in THE FILM ITSELF. The blurred boundary between film/dreaming is accentuated and the audience leaves the cinema (the cinema I watched the movie in was blue ) with a heightened reality, having woken from their own dream.
Appreciate any comments/criticism of this view toward examining what this theory does to countering the starkness of the overriding theory that suggests dream 2/3-reality 1/3 -end of film -go home. I suggest this theory includes the audience and expands the role of cinema (which Lynch must be aiming at) more broadly. Cheers





